Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Victor Ivrii

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 120
31
Chapter 2 / Re: Online textbook, Chapter 2.6, example 7
« on: February 01, 2022, 05:56:58 AM »
For the middle region in red, since $\psi(x - \frac{t}{3})$ is undefined,
It is defined, because on the line $\{x=-t, t>0\}$ we have not 1 but 2 boundary conditions, so in the domain $\{x>-t, t>0\}$ we have essentially a Cauchy problem with the date on the line consisting of two rays: $\{x>0,t=0\}$ and $\{x=-t, t>0\}$.

32
Chapter 1 / Re: HW1 Problem 1 (2)
« on: January 29, 2022, 05:35:01 AM »
You should ask everybody, not just me. And the question was a bit different anyway: to classify an equation

33
Chapter 1 / Re: HW1 Problem 6 (41)
« on: January 28, 2022, 01:41:36 AM »
Yes, it is correct: $u=H(x)+m(y,z)$ where $H$ and $m$ are arbitrary functions.

34
Chapter 1 / Re: Question about the posted solution for HW1 3c
« on: January 27, 2022, 03:59:38 PM »
It was a misprint; it should be $e^{u(x',y)}$ in the denominator

35
Chapter 2 / Re: Chapter 2.2 problem 2
« on: January 27, 2022, 08:04:10 AM »
Both signs. What are curves $x^2-y^2=C$?

36
Quiz 1 / Re: Second Order PDE Classification on Quiz 1?
« on: January 24, 2022, 05:48:42 AM »
Please post non-mathematical questions in Quercus discussions.
Please read description of Quiz 1.

37
Chapter 2 / Re: Transport Equation Derivation
« on: January 24, 2022, 05:46:09 AM »
Then your best shot would be
  • either to ask during Prof Kennedy's Office hours
  • or to formulate the problem and define everything  (that is $u, v, S, \tilde{S}$) here by yourself without screenshots 
My guess that it is a continuity condition.

38
Chapter 2 / Re: Transport Equation Derivation
« on: January 19, 2022, 05:06:34 AM »
It would be really helpfull if you explained where you took this from (if online TextBook--then section and equation number, if lecture then which lecture and which part).

39
Chapter 2 / Re: Week 2 Lec 1 (Chapter 2) question
« on: January 17, 2022, 07:48:38 PM »
Now it is correct $x=Ce^{t}$ and then $C=?$

40
Chapter 1 / Re: chapter 1 Problem 4 (1)
« on: January 17, 2022, 01:29:44 AM »
Display formulae are surrounded by double dollars and no empty lines. Multiline formulae use special environments (google LaTeX gather align

41
Chapter 1 / Re: home assignment1 Q3(1),(2)
« on: January 16, 2022, 05:47:56 PM »
OK. Remarks:

1. Do not use $*$ as a multiplication sign!
2. Do not use LaTeX for italic text (use markdown of the forum--button I)
3. Escape ln, cos, .... : \ln (x) to produce $\ln (x)$ and so on

42
Chapter 1 / Re: Classification of PDEs
« on: January 14, 2022, 01:47:15 PM »
Yes, all linear are also semilinear and all semilinear are also quasilinear. For full mark you need to provide the most precise classification. So, if equation is linear you say "linear", if it is semilinear but not  linear you say "semilinear but not  linear" and so on,... "quasilinear but not  semilinear" and "non-linear and not quasilinear".

43
Chapter 1 / Re: Classification of PDEs
« on: January 14, 2022, 02:45:57 AM »
In particular, the definition of a linear PDE, from the textbook, is: $au_{x}+bu_{y}+cu-f=0$, where $f= f(x,y)$. However, if we simply move the the $cu$ to the right-hand side, we get: $au_{x}+bu_{y}=f-cu$. Now, define $g(x,y,u) = f(x,y)-cu$, then $au_{x}+bu_{y}=g(x,y,u)$, and the right-hand side now depends on lower-order derivatives, so by definition, it's quasi-linear. Could someone help identify the issue with this argument?
First, it will be not just quasilinear, but also  semilinear. Second, it will also be linear since you can move $c(x,y)u$ to the left

Good job, you mastered some $\LaTeX$ basics. :)

44
Chapter 1 / Re: Second Order canonical Form
« on: January 13, 2022, 07:24:23 PM »
We replace differentiation by $x$, y$ by multiplication on $\xi,\eta$. So $\partial_x^2 \mapsto \xi^2$ (just square); as a result senior terms like $Au_{xx}+2Bu_{xy}+ Cu_{yy}$ are replaced by quadratic form $A\xi^2+2B\xi\eta+C\eta^2$.

In the Linear Algebra you studied quadratic forms, right? And you know that
  • if  $AC-B^2 >0$ the canonical form is $\pm (\xi^2+\eta^2)$ (as $\pm A>0$)
  • if  $AC-B^2 <0$ the canonical form is $ (\xi^2-\eta^2)$,
  • if  $AC-B^2 =0$, but at least one of coefficients is not $0$ the canonical form is $\pm \xi^2$.
 

45
Test-2 / Re: Test-2 problem-1 confusion regarding boundary conditions
« on: March 07, 2021, 04:12:41 AM »
Solution is allowed to be discontinuous.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 120