### Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

### Messages - Ian Kivlichan

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4
31
##### Home Assignment 5 / Re: Problem 4
« on: October 31, 2012, 09:53:35 PM »
Hopeful solution for 4.b) attached!

32
##### Home Assignment 5 / Re: Problem 4
« on: October 31, 2012, 09:44:27 PM »
Additional solution for 4.a) (essentially the same as Aida's post here http://forum.math.toronto.edu/index.php?topic=108.msg552#msg552 , but showing more of the sketch, as well as with details on the odd continuation used for sin Fourier series).

33
##### Home Assignment 5 / Re: Problem 6
« on: October 31, 2012, 09:38:35 PM »
Hopeful solution to 6.e) attached!

34
##### Home Assignment 5 / Re: Problem 5
« on: October 31, 2012, 09:32:43 PM »
Hopeful solution for 5.a)!

35
##### Home Assignment 5 / Problem 4
« on: October 31, 2012, 09:32:02 PM »
Hopeful solutions for 4.c)!

edit: Note that sketch is for m=1.

36
##### Home Assignment 5 / Re: Problem 1
« on: October 31, 2012, 02:27:03 AM »
Jinchao: you can integrate (e^x)sin(x) by parts. Set u = e^x, dv = sinx dx, and go through. You'll have to integrate by parts a second time, but you'll end up with (e^x)sinx integrals on both sides. Hope that helps!

37
##### Misc Math / Lecture 12 Eqn 9 Question
« on: October 24, 2012, 01:59:26 AM »
Hi all,

Just to clarify - should equation 9 in the notes for lecture 12 (http://www.math.toronto.edu/courses/apm346h1/20129/L12.html#mjx-eqn-eq-9) read

$\lambda_n = - n^2 \pi^2 / l^2$ ?

Cheers,

Ian

38
##### Term Test 1 / Re: TT1 = Problem 3
« on: October 17, 2012, 01:11:39 AM »
PS. Ian, your posts are virtually useless for a class: too poor handwriting makes it almost impossible to read for anyone who does not know solution. Could you repost?

Sorry!!

I have tried my best to re-write it nicely (edited original post).

39
##### Term Test 1 / Re: TT1 = Problem 2
« on: October 16, 2012, 09:53:02 PM »
Ian, while explanation is basically correct I would like to see more convincing arguments. In particular: where solution will be defined uniquely?
With the given conditions, the I think solution is defined for -inf < x < -t, . The given conditions on u and u_t restrict it there, as any wave starting early in time would have to pass through (x,t)=(x,0). 0 < x < -t, however, does not have the required conditions for uniqueness.

40
##### Term Test 1 / Re: TT1 = Problem 1
« on: October 16, 2012, 09:24:06 PM »
Subqueston (d):

$\frac{dt}{1} = \frac{dx}{x^2}$
$t = -x^{-1}+c$
so the general solution is $u(t,x)=f(t+x^{-1})$.
$u(0,x)=f(x^{-1})=g(x)$
$f(y)=g(y^{-1})$
Since $y=x^{-1}$, so when $x>0$ we have $y>0$ as well.
$u(t,x)=f(t+x^{-1})$
We need $t+x^{-1}>0$
Since $x>0$,
therefore $tx+1>0$
so the domain be defined is \$\{(t,x) | tx>-1 \}.
I think Jinchao has the most correct solution.

Qitan, is it possible to only have the one discontinuity in your solution - won't your characteristic curves be "blocked" by the discontinuity at tx=-1, and not able to go any further?

41
##### Term Test 1 / Re: TT1 = Problem 5
« on: October 16, 2012, 08:25:25 PM »
Solution is attached,

Aida, I think your solution is not correct - the integral from -1 to 0 will only be 0 if x < y in H(x-y), i.e. x < -1.

Also, consider extreme cases - for C(-100), H(-100-y) can never be greater than 0, so a solution with C(x) = 1 cannot be right (unless I've totally misunderstood something).

I believe your solution is not correct; H(x) and H(x-y) has the same value for these two different domain because it is a constant function.

Shouldn't they be different though? For H(x), it's 1 for x>0 and 0 for x<=0, but H(x-y) is 1 for x-y>0, or x>y, and 0 for x<=y.

In any case, how can C(-100) be nonzero? x-y=-100-y>0 is impossible for -1<=y<=1, which is the only area where Q(y) is nonzero.

42
##### Term Test 1 / Re: TT1 = Problem 3
« on: October 16, 2012, 07:51:52 PM »
Solution is attached,

Aida: I'm not sure your solution is correct: u(0,t)=0 and u_x(0,t)=0 don't necessarily imply that u_xx(0,t) = 0. Consider for example u(x, t) = x^2. There, u_xx(0, t) = 2 despite u(0,t)=0 and u_x(0,t)=0.

Up until crossing out u_xx on the last line, though, I think your solution is still right, and your final answer is definitely right. ;P

43
##### Term Test 1 / Re: TT1 = Problem 5
« on: October 16, 2012, 07:39:21 PM »
Solution is attached,

Aida, I think your solution is not correct - the integral from -1 to 0 will only be 0 if x < y in H(x-y), i.e. x < -1.

Also, consider extreme cases - for C(-100), H(-100-y) can never be greater than 0, so a solution with C(x) = 1 cannot be right (unless I've totally misunderstood something).

44
##### Term Test 1 / Re: TT1 = Problem 3
« on: October 16, 2012, 07:32:55 PM »
Solution to Question 3!

Re-wrote solution more nicely at Prof. Ivrii's request. Original at http://i.imgur.com/l4Pw2.jpg

45
##### Term Test 1 / Re: TT1 = Problem 4
« on: October 16, 2012, 07:03:44 PM »
Solution to 4.a) attached!

Re-written more nicely. Original at http://i.imgur.com/M2yhk.jpg

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4