Toronto Math Forum
APM346-2015S => APM346--Home Assignments => HA3 => Topic started by: Victor Ivrii on February 05, 2015, 07:33:12 PM
-
The purpose of this exercise is to show that the maximum principle is not true for the equation $u_t=xu_{xx}$ which has a variable coefficient.
a. Verify that $u=-2xt-x^2$ is a solution.
b. Find the location of its maximum in the closed rectangle $[-2\le x\le 2, 0\le t\le 1]$.
c. Where precisely does our proof of the maximum principle break down for this equation?
-
Part(a)
\begin{array}{l}
\mathop u\nolimits_t = - 2x,\\
\mathop u\nolimits_x = - 2t - 2x\\
\mathop u\nolimits_{xx} = - 2
\end{array}
plugging in the equation, so −2x = −2x. u(x,t) is the solution which satisfies the equation
part(a):
By principle of maximum theorem. If a maximum is at an interior point, then ux=ut=0,then x=t=0, which lies on the bottom boundary, for u = 0 ∀x ∈ (−2, 2). That is there is no maximum in the interior. Now consider case of the two side edges, firstly on the left side, where {(x, t)|x = −2, 0 ≤ t ≤ 1}, u(−2, t) = 4(t − 1) ≤ 0 , for any 0 ≤ t ≤ 1. Next consider the right side, where {(x, t)|x = 2, 0 ≤ t ≤ 1}, u(2, t) = −4(t + 1) < 0, for all 0 ≤ t ≤ 1.Therefore we can conclude that the maximum value of u on the bottom and sides is 0. Consider the case of the top, where {(x, t)| − 2 < x < 2, t = 1},
u(x, 1) = −2x − x^2. If the maximum exists, then x ∈ (−2, 2) and u_x (x,1) = 0.
From part(a), u_x (x,1) = −2 − 2x. Taking u_x=0, then x=-1, hence u_max=u(-1,1)=1
part(b):
consider these situations below:
u_t = −2x, u_t(1,1)=2>0
u_xx = −2, u_xx(-1,1)=-2<0
but u(x,t) still satisfies the PDE equation.
-
Please fix to make it readable (surround formulae by dollar signs)
-
Hopeful solution