### Author Topic: Problem 1  (Read 11670 times)

#### Calvin Arnott

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 43
• Karma: 17
• OK
##### Problem 1
« on: October 18, 2012, 04:39:28 PM »
It seems to me that question 1 part c) doesn't ask any question and instead makes a statement. Is there anything I'm missing there?
« Last Edit: October 18, 2012, 04:51:09 PM by Calvin Arnott »

#### Victor Ivrii

• Elder Member
• Posts: 1332
• Karma: 0
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #1 on: October 18, 2012, 06:47:58 PM »
It seems to me that question 1 part c) doesn't ask any question and instead makes a statement. Is there anything I'm missing there?

Justify  statements.

#### Kun Guo

• Full Member
• Posts: 17
• Karma: 3
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #2 on: October 19, 2012, 12:26:33 AM »
for part a, should we add a condition that alpha and beta are real? Or they have to be real since we are assuming all eigenvalues are real?

#### Victor Ivrii

• Elder Member
• Posts: 1332
• Karma: 0
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #3 on: October 19, 2012, 04:26:48 AM »
for part a, should we add a condition that alpha and beta are real? Or they have to be real since we are assuming all eigenvalues are real?

Right, I put it explicitly. Thanks for checking and asking questions (on behalf of everyone).

#### James McVittie

• Full Member
• Posts: 20
• Karma: 1
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #4 on: October 20, 2012, 09:07:18 AM »
What does OX stand for?

#### Victor Ivrii

• Elder Member
• Posts: 1332
• Karma: 0
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #5 on: October 20, 2012, 10:42:33 AM »

#### Shu Wang

• Jr. Member
• Posts: 11
• Karma: 0
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #6 on: October 20, 2012, 11:53:24 PM »
For X_n expression in a), if why don't we have w_n in front of the cosine, instead we have w?

Also for e) can we assume there are no degeneracy in the eigenfunctions/states? Otherwise they would be orthogonal with equal eigenvalue.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2012, 12:15:22 AM by Shu Wang »

#### Victor Ivrii

• Elder Member
• Posts: 1332
• Karma: 0
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2012, 03:17:35 AM »
For X_n expression in a), if why don't we have w_n in front of the cosine, instead we have w?
Corrected (btw, it is $\omega$, not $w$

Quote
Also for e) can we assume there are no degeneracy in the eigenfunctions/states? Otherwise they would be orthogonal with equal eigenvalue.

Not sure what you mean.

#### Heqian Zhang

• Newbie
• Posts: 2
• Karma: 0
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #8 on: October 22, 2012, 04:49:08 PM »
Hi, I have a question. To solve this question, should we substituting the Xn given into the initial conditions to justify whether it is right ? Or we just use the initial conditions to get the 2 equation given in the problem?

#### Victor Ivrii

• Elder Member
• Posts: 1332
• Karma: 0
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #9 on: October 22, 2012, 05:10:02 PM »
Hi, I have a question. To solve this question, should we substituting the Xn given into the initial conditions to justify whether it is right ? Or we just use the initial conditions to get the 2 equation given in the problem?

Since we have two conditions (one at each end) we call them boundary conditions.

#### James McVittie

• Full Member
• Posts: 20
• Karma: 1
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #10 on: October 24, 2012, 09:30:43 PM »
Solution to Problem 1(d)

To show that eigenfunctions corresponding to different eigenvalues are orthogonal, we evaluate the following:

$$(\lambda_{n}-\lambda_{m})\intop_{0}^{l}X_{n}(x)X_{m}(x)dx$$

Notice that we can make a simple substitution, apply the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus using the boundary conditions. Then,

$$(\lambda_{n}-\lambda_{m})(X_{n}(x)X_{m}(x))=X_{n}"(x)X_{m}-X_{n}(x)X"_{m}(x)=(X_{n}'(x)X_{m}(x)-X_{n}(x)X'_{m}(x))'$$

Plugging into the original integral, we obtain:

$$\intop_{0}^{l}(X_{n}'(x)X_{m}(x)-X_{n}(x)X'_{m}(x))'dx=X_{n}'(l)X_{m}(l)-X_{n}(l)X'_{m}(l)-X_{n}'(0)X_{m}(0)+X_{n}(0)X'_{m}(0)=0$$

Therefore, the eigenfunctions corresponding to different eigenvalues are orthogonal.

#### Victor Ivrii

• Elder Member
• Posts: 1332
• Karma: 0
##### Problem 1--not posted
« Reply #11 on: October 26, 2012, 08:55:06 AM »
You may assume that all eigenvalues are real (which is the case).

Justify examples 6--7 of
Lecture 13
Consider eignevalue problem with Robin boundary conditions
\begin{align*}
& X'' +\lambda X=0 && 0<x<l,\\[3pt]
& X'(0)=\alpha X(0), \quad X'(l)=-\beta X(l)
\end{align*}
$\alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{R}$.

• (a) Prove that positive eigenvalues are $\lambda_n=\omega_n^2$ and the corresponding eigenfunctions are $X_n$ where $\omega_n>0$ are roots of
\begin{align*}
& \tan (\omega l)= \frac{(\alpha+\beta)\omega}{\omega^2-\alpha\beta};\\
& X_n= \omega_n \cos (\omega_n x) +\alpha \sin (\omega_n x);
\end{align*}
($n=1,2,\ldots$).

Solve this equation graphically.
• (b) Prove that negative eigenvalues if there are any are $\lambda_n=-\gamma_n^2$ and the corresponding eigenfunctions are $Y_n$ where $\gamma_n>0$ are roots of
\begin{align*}
& \tanh (\gamma l )= {-\frac{(\alpha + \beta)\gamma }{\gamma ^2 + \alpha\beta}},\\
& Y_n(x) = \gamma_n \cosh (\gamma_n x) + \alpha \sinh (\gamma_n x).
\end{align*}

Solve  this equation graphically.
• (c) To investigate how many negative eigenvalues are, consider the threshold case of eigenvalue $\lambda=0$: then $X=cx+d$ and plugging into b.c. we have $c=\alpha d$ and $c=-\beta (d+lc)$; this system has non-trivial solution $(c,d)\ne 0$ iff $\alpha+\beta+\alpha \beta l =0$. This hyperbola divides $(\alpha,\beta)$-plane into three zones:

Check above arguments and justify that in the described zones there are really no, one, two negative eigenvalues respectively.
• (d) Prove</strong> that eigenfunctions corresponding to different eigenvalues are orthogonal:

\int_0^l X_n(x)X_m (x)\,dx =0\qquad\text{as } \lambda_n\ne \lambda_m
\label{eq-ort}

where we consider now all eigenfunctions (no matter corresponding to positive or negative eigenvalues).
• (e) Bonus  Prove that eigenvalues are simple, i.e. all eigenfunctions corresponding to the same eigenvalue are proportional.

We have proof of (d) but I definitely want (a)--(c) and (e) (I have seen that they were solved in what was submitted). In (c) I allow to use the following fact (which is due to simple variational arguments which unfortunately we have no time to study): Since the problem is symmetric (which implies that e.v. are real) and quadratic form in the right-hand expression of (13.29) is monotone increasing with respect to $\alpha,\beta$, so do eigenvalues $\lambda_n =\lambda_n(\alpha,\beta)$.[/list]

#### Aida Razi

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 62
• Karma: 15
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #12 on: October 29, 2012, 06:57:50 PM »
Part (a) proof:

#### Aida Razi

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 62
• Karma: 15
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #13 on: October 29, 2012, 09:46:48 PM »
Part (b) proof:

#### Fanxun Zeng

• Sr. Member
• Posts: 36
• Karma: 11
##### Re: Problem 1
« Reply #14 on: December 19, 2012, 10:05:43 PM »
Thanks for parts a b d above. As no one has posted part c yet, I just post solution attached.