Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Victor Ivrii

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 154
1
Quiz 1 / Re: Quiz 1 solution
« on: January 29, 2023, 08:22:28 AM »
Yes––as long as you post your variant solution

2
Chapter 1 / Re: Ch.1.1 - 8
« on: January 23, 2023, 06:41:49 AM »
yes, it is
Please write more legibly. Look how I corrected your previous post

3
Chapter 1 / Re: Ch.1.2(16)
« on: January 22, 2023, 03:32:12 PM »
Part $u$ is also linear and homogeneous$. Thus the correct and precise answer is linear homogeneous. 4 Final Exam / Re: Alternative solution to the optimization in Problem 2 on the practice final « on: April 25, 2022, 07:51:30 AM » Yes, it can be solved using Lagrange multiplies. However note, if restrictions are$g_1\le 0$,$g_2\le 0$,$g_3\le 0$you need to consider •$g_1=0$(and$g_2\le 0, g_3\le 0)$); there will be only one Lagrange multiplier at$g_1$. Two other cases in the similar way •$g_1=g_2=0$(and$ g_3\le 0)$); there will be two Lagrange multipliers. Two other cases in the similar way It will be, however, more cumbersome. Note that (1) corresponds to two rays and one arc, (2) to two corners. No, you need not consider quadratic forms after you found all suspicious points. It would serve no purpose. 5 Test 2 / Misprints are possible « on: March 30, 2022, 07:17:41 PM » Misprints are possible 6 Test 2 / Re: Sturm Liouville eigenfunctions « on: March 30, 2022, 07:15:38 PM » they defined up to a constant 7 Quiz 5 / Re: Quiz 5 « on: March 27, 2022, 11:44:46 AM » My question for Quiz5 was to decompose a function into full Fourier Series [0,$\pi$]. I wonder is it equivalent as decompose into full Fourier Series on [$-\pi$,$\pi$]? No Quote I understand it is equivalent when the function is even, but I'm wondering what should I do when the function is odd. What is the problem? There are formulae for interval$[\alpha,\beta]$. 8 Chapter 5 / Re: Theorem 3 in chapter 5 question « on: March 18, 2022, 08:17:41 AM » It is the derivative of Fourier transform; otherwise it would be$\widehat{f'}(k)$and covered by another property 9 Chapter 5 / Re: Chapter 5.3 Problem 1.1 « on: March 13, 2022, 04:19:38 PM » You are right, it was a misprint 10 Test 1 / Re: Test 1 coverage « on: March 03, 2022, 12:11:32 PM » Look at samples posted 11 Test 1 / Re: Test 1 Wave equation and Heat equation questions « on: March 01, 2022, 11:21:39 AM » Yes, you need to perform calculations 12 Chapter 3 / Re: Chapter 3.1 Theorem 4 « on: February 27, 2022, 07:52:52 PM » Indeed, to be corrected. Thanks 13 Chapter 2 / Re: Derivation of D' Alembert formula under Characteristic Coordinate « on: February 21, 2022, 04:34:15 AM » Quote But how does this qualify us to replace the indefinite integral with the definite one? Did you take Calculus I? Then you must know that if the preimitive (indefinite integral) is a set of definite integrals which differ by an arbitrary constant. 14 Chapter 2 / Re: Text Book 2.4 Example 2.1 « on: February 20, 2022, 10:04:48 AM » We integrate from$t=0$because for$t=0$initial conditions are done.$-1<t $is a domain where$f(x,t)$is defined 15 Chapter 2 / Re: Derivation of D' Alembert formula under Characteristic Coordinate « on: February 20, 2022, 10:01:28 AM » Reproduce formula correctly (there are several errors) and think about explanation why$\phi'(\xi)=0\$.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 154