31
Chapter 2 / Re: Week 2 Lec 1 (Chapter 2) question
« on: January 17, 2022, 07:48:38 PM »
Now it is correct $x=Ce^{t}$ and then $C=?$
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
32
Chapter 1 / Re: chapter 1 Problem 4 (1)
« on: January 17, 2022, 01:29:44 AM »
Display formulae are surrounded by double dollars and no empty lines. Multiline formulae use special environments (google LaTeX gather align
33
Chapter 1 / Re: home assignment1 Q3(1),(2)
« on: January 16, 2022, 05:47:56 PM »
OK. Remarks:
1. Do not use $*$ as a multiplication sign!
2. Do not use LaTeX for italic text (use markdown of the forum--button I)
3. Escape ln, cos, .... : \ln (x) to produce $\ln (x)$ and so on
1. Do not use $*$ as a multiplication sign!
2. Do not use LaTeX for italic text (use markdown of the forum--button I)
3. Escape ln, cos, .... : \ln (x) to produce $\ln (x)$ and so on
34
Chapter 1 / Re: Classification of PDEs
« on: January 14, 2022, 01:47:15 PM »
Yes, all linear are also semilinear and all semilinear are also quasilinear. For full mark you need to provide the most precise classification. So, if equation is linear you say "linear", if it is semilinear but not linear you say "semilinear but not linear" and so on,... "quasilinear but not semilinear" and "non-linear and not quasilinear".
35
Chapter 1 / Re: Classification of PDEs
« on: January 14, 2022, 02:45:57 AM »In particular, the definition of a linear PDE, from the textbook, is: $au_{x}+bu_{y}+cu-f=0$, where $f= f(x,y)$. However, if we simply move the the $cu$ to the right-hand side, we get: $au_{x}+bu_{y}=f-cu$. Now, define $g(x,y,u) = f(x,y)-cu$, then $au_{x}+bu_{y}=g(x,y,u)$, and the right-hand side now depends on lower-order derivatives, so by definition, it's quasi-linear. Could someone help identify the issue with this argument?First, it will be not just quasilinear, but also semilinear. Second, it will also be linear since you can move $c(x,y)u$ to the left
Good job, you mastered some $\LaTeX$ basics.
36
Chapter 1 / Re: Second Order canonical Form
« on: January 13, 2022, 07:24:23 PM »
We replace differentiation by $x$, y$ by multiplication on $\xi,\eta$. So $\partial_x^2 \mapsto \xi^2$ (just square); as a result senior terms like $Au_{xx}+2Bu_{xy}+ Cu_{yy}$ are replaced by quadratic form $A\xi^2+2B\xi\eta+C\eta^2$.
In the Linear Algebra you studied quadratic forms, right? And you know that
In the Linear Algebra you studied quadratic forms, right? And you know that
- if $AC-B^2 >0$ the canonical form is $\pm (\xi^2+\eta^2)$ (as $\pm A>0$)
- if $AC-B^2 <0$ the canonical form is $ (\xi^2-\eta^2)$,
- if $AC-B^2 =0$, but at least one of coefficients is not $0$ the canonical form is $\pm \xi^2$.
37
Test-2 / Re: Test-2 problem-1 confusion regarding boundary conditions
« on: March 07, 2021, 04:12:41 AM »
Solution is allowed to be discontinuous.
38
Chapter 3 / Re: Rouché's Theorem
« on: December 12, 2020, 06:25:05 PM »
You need to indicate that there are no zeroes on $\gamma$
39
Chapter 7 / Re: Drawing phase portrait with complex eigenvalues question
« on: December 01, 2020, 08:46:13 PM »
"How ellipses wouls look like" means the directions and relative size of their semi-axis. See frame 4 of MAT244_W8L3 handout
40
Chapter 4 / Re: Section 4.4 Past Final Exam Question
« on: November 22, 2020, 05:19:33 AM »
There could be misprints
41
Chapter 4 / Re: General Question related to something in Section 4.1
« on: November 13, 2020, 12:54:44 PM »
For higher order equations it is covered in MAT244-LEC0201-W6L2 (see modules). It is mandatory material.
42
Chapter 4 / Re: 4.2 question 28
« on: October 25, 2020, 01:13:50 PM »
you need to write it, if you hope for any answer
43
Test 1 / Re: 2020TT1 Deferred Sitting #1
« on: October 15, 2020, 08:17:16 AM »
Indeed, instead of $\log(\pm w)$ with $+2\pi mi$ we write $\log(w)$ with $+\pi mi$ since $\log (-w)=\log(w)+\i i$
44
Test 1 / Re: Abel's Theorem
« on: October 15, 2020, 08:11:23 AM »
Of some fundamental set (remember a constant factor!)
45
Chapter 2 / Re: Section 2.2 "closed form" Qs
« on: October 13, 2020, 09:35:57 AM »
Yes, some of them are geometric series, and some of $e^{z}$, $\sin(z)$, $\sinh(z)$ and so on. However some can be derived from those, ether by substitution (f.e. $z^2$ instead of $z$), some by integration, differentiation, multiplication by $z^m$ or combination of both. F.e. consider geometric $\dfrac{1}{1-z}$. Integratinfg we can get power series for $-\Log (1-z)$, diffeerentiating for $\frac{1}{(1-z)^m}$ ,...