1
MAT334--Lectures & Home Assignments / Mobius tranformation
« on: December 01, 2018, 05:56:54 PM »
What is the formula or way for finding the rotation angle (arg(𝑓′(𝑧))) for the derivative of Mobius transformation?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
MAT334--Lectures & Home Assignments / Re: Final Exam Scope?
« on: December 01, 2018, 12:37:09 PM »
Yes I have the same question is 3.4 on exam?
3
End of Semester Bonus--sample problem for FE / Re: FE Sample--Problem 5
« on: November 28, 2018, 12:04:42 PM »
I don't quite understand why the only root is real?. Can you explain more
4
MAT244--Lectures & Home Assignments / Final Review 9.2 and 9.3
« on: November 27, 2018, 09:48:48 PM »
I would appreciate if anyone can share the technique for drawing phase planes by hand. I get the idea of linearization and finding the equilibrium points and classifying those but have difficulty in sketching the phase planes. I am not sure about how exactly to draw it by hand.
5
MAT334--Lectures & Home Assignments / Section 2.6
« on: November 21, 2018, 10:29:04 AM »
Does anyone know how to approach questions 4 to 8 in 2.6? It says to follow example 3- 6 but I tried and I am stuck. Any help would be appreciated
6
Quiz-6 / Re: Q6 TUT 0401
« on: November 18, 2018, 11:10:01 PM »
The potraits are clockwise, Since b > 0 and c < 0
9
MAT334--Lectures & Home Assignments / Help with attempting questions 17 -20 1.6
« on: October 09, 2018, 05:01:52 PM »
I am not sure on how to approach the questions 17-20 from 1.6.
For 17 I started off using the green's theorem
$$ \int_{\gamma} (Pdx + Qdy) = \iint_{\omega} \Bigl[\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y} \Bigr]dxdy
$$
Since $Pdx + Qdy$ is exact differential $P = \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}$ and $Q = \frac{\partial g}{\partial y}$
$$\frac{\partial P}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial ^2 g}{\partial x \partial y} \\
\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial ^2 g}{\partial x \partial y}$$
So $\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y} = 0$
Hence $$\int_{\gamma} (Pdx + Qdy) = \iint_{\omega} \Bigl[\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\Bigr] dxdy= 0$$
Not sure if this is correct and how to proceed with 18-20
For 17 I started off using the green's theorem
$$ \int_{\gamma} (Pdx + Qdy) = \iint_{\omega} \Bigl[\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y} \Bigr]dxdy
$$
Since $Pdx + Qdy$ is exact differential $P = \frac{\partial g}{\partial x}$ and $Q = \frac{\partial g}{\partial y}$
$$\frac{\partial P}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial ^2 g}{\partial x \partial y} \\
\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial ^2 g}{\partial x \partial y}$$
So $\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y} = 0$
Hence $$\int_{\gamma} (Pdx + Qdy) = \iint_{\omega} \Bigl[\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\Bigr] dxdy= 0$$
Not sure if this is correct and how to proceed with 18-20
10
MAT334--Lectures & Home Assignments / Re: Section 1.6 Question 3
« on: October 09, 2018, 04:46:27 PM »
Try using parmetrization, $ r(t) = 2 + (1+i)t, t \in [0,1] $
$ r(t) = 2 + (1 +i)t
= (2 +t)+ it \\
r'(t) = 1 + i $
$ r(t) = 2 + (1 +i)t
= (2 +t)+ it \\
r'(t) = 1 + i $
11
MAT334--Lectures & Home Assignments / Section 1.4 Question 1
« on: October 01, 2018, 08:02:20 PM »
lim n -> infinity zn = ((1 +i)/(sqrt(3))n.
I used polar coordinates to solving giving r = sqrt(2/3)
xn =sqrt(2/3) cos(n * pi /4)
yn =sqrt(2/3) sin(n * pi /4)
zn = sqrt(2/3) cos(n * pi /4) + isqrt(2/3) sin(n * pi /4)
From this how can show that it converges to 0?
I used polar coordinates to solving giving r = sqrt(2/3)
xn =sqrt(2/3) cos(n * pi /4)
yn =sqrt(2/3) sin(n * pi /4)
zn = sqrt(2/3) cos(n * pi /4) + isqrt(2/3) sin(n * pi /4)
From this how can show that it converges to 0?
13
MAT334--Lectures & Home Assignments / To show z1z2 = 0 implies z1 = 0 or z2 = 0
« on: September 24, 2018, 03:27:11 PM »
Will a prove which uses rectangular coordinates definition of z1 and z2 would be fine?
Using z1 = x1 +iy1 and z2 = x2 + iy2 and using some algebra to prove z1z2 = 0 implies z1 = 0 or z2 = 0
Barely comprehensible. Next such post will be deleted. V.I.
Using z1 = x1 +iy1 and z2 = x2 + iy2 and using some algebra to prove z1z2 = 0 implies z1 = 0 or z2 = 0
Barely comprehensible. Next such post will be deleted. V.I.
14
MAT334--Lectures & Home Assignments / Section 1.1 question 3 part f and g
« on: September 17, 2018, 07:18:12 PM »
$\renewcommand{\Re}{\operatorname{Re}}$
How is the sketch for locus
(f) $\,\Re[(1-i) \bar{z} ] = 0$
(g) $\Re[z/(1+i)] = 0$
How is the sketch for locus
(f) $\,\Re[(1-i) \bar{z} ] = 0$
(g) $\Re[z/(1+i)] = 0$
Pages: [1]